SOGO論壇
  登入   註冊   找回密碼
查看: 15365|回覆: 56
列印 上一主題 下一主題

[其他] 美國防衛新聞 : 我海軍承認為採購日本蒼龍級潛艇進行溝通 [複製連結]

Rank: 2

狀態︰ 離線
跳轉到指定樓層
1
發表於 2015-12-7 10:13:20 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 | x 3
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2015-12-7 13:51 編輯

http: //www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/submarines/2015/12/05/taiwan-turning-screws-washingtons-sub-deal/76676188/

2015 12/05
..................................................

WASHINGTON — In 2001, President George W. Bush's administration released the largest arms package to R.O.C. since the closing of US military bases on the island in 1979. The deal included four Kidd-class destroyers, 12 P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft and eight diesel-electric submarines.

Since then, the package has been completed except for the submarine offer. The many sticking points include the fact the US has not built diesel-electric attack submarines since the last Barbel-class was finished in 1959. But that has not stopped R.O.C. Navy from pushing forward on an official release via the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) office before beginning an indigenous build program.

R.O.C. frustrations with the US FMS process it began 14 years ago are growing, leading it to pursue an indigenous construction effort that it hopes will  provide some tactical and strategic leverage against mainland’s rapidly growing naval modernization efforts.

On Dec. 1, the Washington-based Project 2049 Institute sponsored a conference on the topic with R.O.C. Rear Adm. David T.W. Yang presenting the keynote speech. The conference, “A Deep Dive: R.O.C. Future Submarine Program,” included commentary by Mark Stokes, executive director of the Project 2049 Institute.

Stokes said the US FMS effort was frozen in 2007 due to a number of factors: political considerations and U.S.-Mainland Communist  relations; domestic debates in R.O.C. over pursuing an FMS program or an indigenous build; perceived cost effectiveness in the US of building only eight subs; US operational considerations regarding waterspace management as more countries in Asia procure submarines; and past US Navy institutional concerns over fears in the nuclear submarine community that cheaper diesel electric subs might be forced upon them during future budget cuts.

It should be noted that Stokes served as the Pentagon’s team chief and senior country director for mainland, R.O.C. and Mongolia in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs during the 2001 arms release. He is described by many within the US and R.O.C. defense industries as the architect of the original arms package and continues to be a major advocate of R.O.C. acquisition of submarines.

Yang, who is a military attaché at R.O.C. de facto embassy, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office, told the conference that R.O.C. has improved its anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities with the procurement of the P-3 aircraft, but additional enhancements are required. “The training programs, however, failed to meet requirements because of limitations of the aging submarines ... and R.O.C. defensive capabilities are adversely affected.”

R.O.C. only two combat-operational submarines are Dutch-built Zwaardvis-class subs acquired in the late 1980s. It also has two of the oldest submarines in operation — two Guppy-class submarines acquired in the early 1970s that served at the end of World War II. These submarines are described as training platforms, not operational ones.

Yang said the Guppys should be replaced and the Zwaardvis “urgently” need to be refurbished. He said the FMS program has been “suspended through the ‘interagency review’ phase for over a decade ... [and now] R.O.C. has been urging the US to accelerate the FMS process to provide R.O.C. with the urgently needed submarines.”

Yang said R.O.C. has created the Indigenous Defense Submarine (IDS) program to fulfill its requirements. IDS will be built locally with some foreign, including American, assistance.

“In consideration of the longstanding security cooperation with the US, acquiring submarines from the US government will remain as the priority option," he said. "Until there is a concrete response from the US, a dual-track ‘FMS-plus-IDS’ policy will be implemented.”

Yang admitted that R.O.C. was “in communication” with Japan for a possible deal for Soryu-class submarines. Japan’s export defense restrictions have been eased, and Japan and Australia are currently working on a joint submarine program.

Bob Nugent of AMI International, a Bremerton, Washington–based naval market analysis and advisory firm, said he could “envision a scenario where there is an outright sale to R.O.C. of Japanese submarines.” The current price is around $500 million a hull for the Soryu, and that includes airindependent propulsion — significantly less than the US offer estimated at $800 million for just the design stage.

Mainland and Japan are bickering over control of the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, which Japan controls and mainland Communist claims as its territory. Additional friction was created in 2013 when Mainland Communist announced an air defense identification zone in the East China Sea, which included the airspace over the Senkakus. Increased Continental Communist fighter and surveillance flights into Japanese air space in recent years have also rattled Tokyo.

Both Republic Of China(Taiwan) and Japan face an enormous Continental Communist submarine fleet that now numbers over 70 submarines. Yang called the growth “aggressive.”

.......................................................

隨著近日不斷傳出美國將在月底宣布對華軍售的消息,有關中華民國欲購買新型潛艦的說法也再度引起國內議論。不過美國《防務新聞》5日稱,鑒於當前局勢,中華民國求購新型潛艦的最佳選擇不在美國,而是在日本。中華民國海軍將領透露,中華民國正在同日本商談購買蒼龍級潛艦的可能性。

報道稱,2001年美國布希政府宣布的一連串對華軍售協議中,就包括提供8艘常規動力潛艦,但這些潛艦至今沒有交艦。造成這種情況的重要原因是美國自從1959年建造完成白魚級柴電潛艦後,就沒有再造過常規潛艦,而其他國家也因政治原因拒絕對華提供這種攻擊型武器。盡管中華民國試圖自行研發潛艦,但無論在技術還是資金層面都困難重重。目前中華民國僅有兩艘荷蘭建造的旗魚級常規潛艦具備戰鬥力,它們是上世紀80年代末採購的,如今急需升級。中華民國國軍另兩艘二戰期間建造的古董潛艇只能作為訓練平台。

專注台海關系的美國智庫“2049研究所”於12月1日主辦了一場專題研討會,中華民國海軍少將大衛·楊(音譯)在會上發表了主題演說。他透露,中華民國正在同日本商談購買蒼龍級常規潛艦的可能性。報道稱,日本政府已經放寬武器出口的限制,並力推蒼龍級潛艦參與澳大利亞的新型潛艦采購案競標。蒼龍級潛艦號稱是全球最先進的常規潛艇之一,可安裝“不依賴空氣的推進裝置(AIP)”,能在水下連續航行數周不用上浮,極大增強了隱蔽性。大衛·楊表示,中華民國目前採取“向美國採購+本土建造”的雙軌制政策,並推進“本土防禦潛艦”項目來滿足其需求,其中“本土防禦潛艦”就包括同外國合作者在本土共同建造。據稱,日本向澳大利亞推銷蒼龍級潛艦時,已許諾可以轉讓技術並在當地生產,這也為中華民國引進日本潛艇掃清相關障礙。

美國海軍問題咨詢公司AMI國際的鮑勃·紐金特認為,現在蒼龍級潛艦的單價約5億美元(不包含AIP系統),明顯低於美國的報價,後者僅設計階段就要8億美元。報道暗示,日本與中華民國有著“共同威脅”,“當前中華民國台灣和日本都面對著龐大的大陸地區共軍潛艇隊,大陸地區共軍潛艇數量已經超過70艘。大衛·楊聲稱,大陸地區共軍潛艇數量增長‘咄咄逼人’”。

報道稱,大衛·楊也表示,中華民國仍優先考慮採購由美國建造的潛艦:考慮到同美國的長期安全合作,中華民國從美國政府那裡採購常規潛艦仍將是優先選擇。他表示,中華民國政府正在敦促美國加快對外軍售程序,以便提供給中華民國迫切需要的潛艦。

...........................................................................

日本的還比美國設計的便宜 ,大家認為如果真的能採購成功 , 最想買美國做的還是日本的請發表一下看法 謝謝。
喜歡嗎?分享這篇文章給親朋好友︰
               感謝作者     

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

熱心參予論壇活動及用心回覆主題勳章 軍武十字勳章

狀態︰ 離線
2
發表於 2015-12-7 10:23:57 |只看該作者
自製潛艦對ROC最好
可以金購引援、技轉、風險管理等等
能量一定要保存
但凡外購處處受制他人
今日僥倖購得 他日便如何?
現在不流汗 以後就流淚

點評

magicptop  無奈是無良政客!只觀眼前利益!而斷算我國的技術 IDF就是個最好的例子  發表於 2015-12-8 06:17:19
Dick88  尋求澳州模式技術轉移 來台灣造不過經費要有決心付擔的起順便發展扶植相關產業  發表於 2015-12-7 10:30:20
1937年8月毛澤東在陝北洛川會議訂出具體方法:
「為了發展壯大我黨的武裝力量,在戰後奪取全國政權。我們黨必須嚴格遵循的方針是『一分抗日,二分敷衍,七分發展,十分宣傳』

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

狀態︰ 離線
3
發表於 2015-12-7 10:24:25 |只看該作者
希望能買到或技術合作

Rank: 3Rank: 3

狀態︰ 離線
4
發表於 2015-12-7 10:40:21 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2015-12-7 13:52 編輯

我想日本需要外銷來刺激國內經濟成長 , 但同時也需考量大陸地區當局的反應

能買日本的當然勝於老美 , 技術轉移也很重要 , 等級約位於"劍龍級plus"~

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

狀態︰ 離線
5
發表於 2015-12-7 13:19:30 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2015-12-7 13:53 編輯
Andy_0109 發表於 2015-12-7 10:24  
希望能買到或技術合作


單就直接與日本購買或技轉,個人認為不太可能,
日本畢竟在大國有太多的商業行為,不會單獨為我國犧牲的,
最大的可能是先透過美國的購買再轉到我國的模式才較有可能的機會,
不過老美也不是善類,等到我國想要有日裔美籍的蒼龍級潛艦,我猜至少也要15年後吧,
因為那時蒼龍再也不是日本的主力潛艇囉

Rank: 4

狀態︰ 離線
6
發表於 2015-12-7 13:31:52 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2015-12-7 13:53 編輯

別傻了!
日本只可能私下轉移製作方式予我國而不可能光明正大出售成品給我國
大陸日本太劍拔弩張對雙方都不好

面對它、接受它、處理它、放下它

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

狀態︰ 離線
7
發表於 2015-12-7 14:00:39 |只看該作者
karlgpo 發表於 2015-12-7 13:19  
單就直接與日本購買或技轉,個人認為不太可能,
日本畢竟在大國有太多的商業行為,不會單獨為我國犧牲的,
最 ...

努力去爭取

Rank: 2

狀態︰ 離線
8
發表於 2015-12-7 15:04:41 |只看該作者
個人認為成品購買轉移大概是不可能
我倒認為可以以化整為零的方式進行在我國秘密組裝建造
可以在國內做的就做 其他都從日本運過來
整組日方技術人員到我國在隔離保護嚴密管制的環境下工作
所有硬體設施準備規劃由日方主導
我方也可以在建造過程中觀摩學些東西
以我國與日本的地理位置相近 材料系統的交通運輸與日方工作人員的進出應該都不是大問題
雙方甚至可以在重要組件的運輸上提供全程的護航

多的費用再怎麼貴也沒有美國抽一手貴, 也防止美國借轉手日艦的過程砍掉一些原有的功能或加入限制

Rank: 6Rank: 6

狀態︰ 離線
9
發表於 2015-12-7 15:54:08 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2015-12-8 00:16 編輯

可不可以那8台春潮級的用廢鐵價賣給我國先

點評

22048892  哎呦 不錯喔~  發表於 2015-12-8 22:14:07
qaz150199  XD喂~~!!  發表於 2015-12-7 19:02:02
歷史是  檢討之根.歌誦之惡

Rank: 8Rank: 8

狀態︰ 離線
10
發表於 2015-12-7 15:58:16 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2015-12-8 00:16 編輯

我極贊同經由美國敦促日本的潛艦和技術賣給我國!

點評

大寮  經過美國購艦成本會增加很多 不如自行接洽談判會對我方比較有利  發表於 2016-3-30 15:24:55
請注意︰利用多帳號發表自問自答的業配文置入性行銷廣告者,將直接禁訪或刪除帳號及全部文章!
您需要登錄後才可以回覆 登入 | 註冊


本論壇為非營利自由討論平台,所有個人言論不代表本站立場。文章內容如有涉及侵權,請通知管理人員,將立即刪除相關文章資料。侵權申訴或移除要求:abuse@oursogo.com

GMT+8, 2024-6-4 06:49

© 2004-2024 SOGO論壇 OURSOGO.COM
回頂部