SOGO論壇
  登入   註冊   找回密碼
查看: 5374|回覆: 13
列印 上一主題 下一主題

[軍事資訊] 雷神公司更動軟體,讓標六變身反艦飛彈! [複製連結]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

狀態︰ 離線
跳轉到指定樓層
1
發表於 2016-6-23 21:12:12 |只看該作者 |正序瀏覽 | x 2
本帖最後由 twnese85 於 2016-6-23 21:13 編輯

若有翻譯解讀錯誤請告知!   內容大綱是: 美海軍能大喊: 新反艦飛彈是真正的殺手!

幾個月前在夏威夷的沿岸,海軍測試反艦版標準六型飛彈(SM-6 / RIM-174 )擊沉了佩里級靶船、而雷神公司與海軍人員表示SM-6有了攻擊海上目標的能力,而這提供了更多的戰略意義。此測試是由 Raytheon 雷神公司,與美國海軍人員共同進行。

達成此能力的在於更動軟體設定,給予供該飛彈有在海上追蹤且摧毀目標能力。改變設計後可攻擊水面目標,讓美國軍艦有對大範圍水面上目標的攻擊能力。
而改良後SM-6可由設定改變,變換攻擊模式從防空用、改變成攻擊船艦的模式。而由船艦偵測目標後,飛彈會依循訊號來判段,選擇攻擊模式來摧毀目標。


感想 >> 真是便宜,這樣就不用另外研發全新反艦飛彈、改軟體設定就好。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://nationalinterest.org/blog ... -missile-real-16680
The US Navy Can Now Prove Its New Anti-Ship Missile Is a Real Killer

The Navy's Standard Missile 6 exploded, destroyed and sank a surface ship target in a test several months ago off the coast of Hawaii, providing additional strategic relevance for an new offensive use of a missile previous oriented toward air and ballistic missile defense, Raytheon and Navy officials said.

"The anti-surface warfare test proved that SM-6 could attack a surface ship. It destroyed a Perry-class fast Frigate. The big deal for us is that the SM-6 proved its capability with sea targets," Mike Campisi, SM-6 Senior Director, Raytheon, told Scout Warrior in an interview.

The test, which took place at Pacific Missile Range Facility, Hawaii, involved the rare event of an actual destruction and sinking of a decommissioned or retired Navy ship.

The firing of the SM-6 was designed to analyze new software configurations on the missile, giving it an ability to track and destroy targets on the surface of the water - as opposed to its typical use of hitting or intercepting incoming enemy fire from the air above a ship or near the earth's atmosphere as a ballistic missile defense weapon.

Using the SM-6 as an offensive weapon against surface targets is a new application for the Navy, bringing another kind of surface fire-power to the fleet. The SM-6 is larger than the SM-3 interceptor and is designed to destroy closer-in air targets. However, this test launches the ability for the SM-6 function in an additional capacity as an offensive weapon against a wide range of surface targets.

"The entire system was tested at this time. It performed exactly as we expected and the result more than met our expectations. We added to the sea- based terminal capabiity (ballistic missile defense) and anti-air defense," Campisi added. "In effect,m this will allow the fleet to attack ships with offensive capability and prove out the flip side of area defense -- which is distributed lethality."

The software adjustments to the missile allow a single SM-6 to perform all of its different functions, he explained.

"The system will identify a target and send a signal to the target. Based on the signal, it chooses the software path and the activities it is going to perform in engaging its mission," Campisi said.

The SM-6 weapon has been operational since 2013; the Navy has at least 250 of the missiles in its arsenal. The service recently awarded Raytheon a $270 million deal for 2016 SM-6 production.

SM-6 Technology:

The USS John Paul Jones, an Arleigh Burke Class destroyer, fired the SM-6 using on board fire-control technology and Aegis Radar systems equipped with the latest technology called Baseline 9. The missile’s final assembly takes place at Raytheon’s state-of-the-art SM-6 and SM-3 all-up-round production facility at Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Ala.

The SM-6 is unique in several respects; the weapon uses what is called an "active" seeker, meaning it can send a signal or electromagnetic ping forward in addition to receiving them. This gives the missile to better attack manuering or moving targets at sea, because it does not need to rely upon a ship-based illuminator to bounce a signal off a target for a merely "passive" seeker to receive. This technology also allows a ship commander to fire several SM-6 missiles in more rapid succession or closer to one another in the event that a target needs to be attacked with more than one missile.

An emerging Navy technology called Naval Integrated Fire Control - Counter Air, or NIFC-CA, also relies upon the SM-6 to help identify, track and destroy approaching anti-ship cruise missiles from distances beyond the horizon. The NIFC-CA system, which was first deployed last year, also relies upon an airborne sensor to relay a signal from an approaching enemy target.

The SM-6 is configured to fire from Navy Cruisers and Destroyers out of a Vertical Launch System tube; although there is not yet a ship deck-mounted launcher for the missile, it appears conceivable that the Navy could explore an option along these lines. This would enable the weapon to fire from a wider range of ships such as the Littoral Combat Ship, Frigates, Amphibious Assault Ships or even Aircraft Carriers.

The development of this weapon, along with other missiles and emerging offensive and defensive technologies, is entirely consistent with the Navy's "distributed lethality" strategy; this ongoing effort aims to better arm ships with next-generation communications technology and cutting-edge, longer-range offensive and defensive weapons. This is informed by a series of key concepts such as efforst to better enable surface ships to conduct open or "blue" water combat against a near-peer adversary, sustain the Navy's global technological edge, hold enemies at risk from farther distances and allow surface ships to both "aggregate" and "distribute" or disperse as needed as a way to reduce the prospect of a successful enemy attack.

Kris Osborn became the Managing Editor of Scout Warrior in August of 2015. His role with Scout.com includes managing content on the Scout Warrior site and generating independently sourced original material. Scout Warrior is aimed at providing engaging, substantial military-specific content covering a range of key areas such as weapons, emerging or next-generation technologies and issues of relevance to the military. Just prior to coming to Scout Warrior, Osborn served as an Associate Editor at the Military.com. This story originally appeared in Scout Warrior.

喜歡嗎?分享這篇文章給親朋好友︰
               感謝作者     

狀態︰ 離線
14
發表於 2016-6-26 21:04:14 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 寒冰神話 於 2016-6-26 21:18 編輯

這只是老美海軍的一個回應:
其它國家/地區(俄國,大陸地區)一向取笑老美沒有超音速反艦彈 。現實是老美不想發展 老美認為超音速反艦彈不實際)
被笑久了 ,起睹爛 就秀一手 ,沒超音速反艦是吧, 老子我只要改一下設定 SM-6
一樣可以打到船 還有演習認證。
老美只是說 要玩超音速反艦 狼群攻擊 我拿現有SM-6 改設定一樣做得到, 還有CEC 可以導引
後面絕招才是LRASM ,你敵方對SM-6 飽和攻擊 ,也不可能每顆都打下來
破壞力 不足又如何, 反正只要打到電子設備 ,後面還有LRASM 破壞力比魚又 大2倍, 讓俄羅斯和大陸好好想想
超音速反艦戰術
誰怕誰

Rank: 2

狀態︰ 離線
13
發表於 2016-6-25 09:05:42 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 ds123450 於 2016-6-25 09:28 編輯

標六改成全功能威力沒有那麼大
中科院弓三、雄三飛彈飛試影片首度公開:http://youtu.be/Abm3SZVcVpQ  
弓三要改成 對艦 我覺得是很浪費
(弓三攻擊模式)是靠近目標 先用前面彈頭爆炸
用大量的碎片形成大片彈幕擊傷戰機造成嚴重受損(極有可能駕駛員就先受傷)
後段在用爆炸 形成大火球直接撞擊戰機
如果用這種方式船也是沉    機動性絕對是ok
還是覺得浪費 台灣有雄三就夠殺
天弓型攻擊模式就像這樣  只是飛彈比電影中(SA13)來的大顆威力相較之下更大  
美國海軍F18, 與飛彈纏鬥及逃生:http://youtu.be/Hj7mt2Jox00   
(這是衝出封鎖線的片段)

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

狀態︰ 離線
12
發表於 2016-6-24 15:09:16 |只看該作者
砸對手的電戰設備可以....打穿?擊沉?????再說

Rank: 2

狀態︰ 離線
11
發表於 2016-6-24 11:02:03 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 Dick88 於 2016-6-24 11:04 編輯

國家利益 那個網站文章參考看看就好
幻想情節比較多 都是標題很聳動
標6要能當完全航艦殺手
那還研發 LRASM 遠程反艦飛彈做什麼
頂多高低配 實驗性質居多

Rank: 4

狀態︰ 離線
10
發表於 2016-6-24 10:20:40 |只看該作者
防空飛彈不宜用來攻擊面目標, 實在浪費彈藥
除非情況迫不得已, 又或者情況非常有利時
1757年,英法兩國為爭奪美洲殖民地拼戰至第三年,
我們摩根族就只打剩我最後一個人了

Rank: 3Rank: 3

狀態︰ 離線
9
發表於 2016-6-24 09:58:29 |只看該作者
速度與閃躲不知行不行??

Rank: 2

狀態︰ 離線
8
發表於 2016-6-24 07:36:58 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 ds123450 於 2016-6-24 07:39 編輯
eszerfrm 發表於 2016-6-24 05:59  
打小船還可以,大船別想了


那天弓打船會不會太... 天弓是防空飛彈攻擊

點評

K988  SM-6也是打飛機的.不也改軟體可用來打船.這樣更多用途不好嗎?  發表於 2016-6-24 18:29:39

Rank: 4

狀態︰ 離線
7
發表於 2016-6-24 05:59:40 |只看該作者
twnese85 發表於 2016-6-23 23:57  
挺好奇天弓三能不能比照辦理?

打小船還可以,大船別想了

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

狀態︰ 離線
6
發表於 2016-6-24 03:56:08 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 oneeast00 於 2016-6-24 04:04 編輯
kds129 發表於 2016-6-23 21:59  
其實1988年時SM-2就有對海攻擊模式而且實戰中擊沉對方過了
這對Raytheon來說不是難事,只算是附加功能


(1)打伊朗快艇的是 Perry的SM-1  , 那天戰鬥 , SM-2是打掉伊朗一架F-4E

(2)那次戰鬥 , 轟了4發SM-1都打不沉200頓的快艇, 得靠艦砲收場
 事後研究. 應該是 SM-1對付比飛機堅固的船艦目標時 , <對空用近發引信> 讓飛彈太早引爆 ,
   好像因為如此 SM-2後期/ SM-3不再強調反艦

On April 18, 1988, USS Simpson was accompanying the cruiser USS Wainwright and frigate USS Bagley when they came under attack from the Iranian gunboat Joshan which fired a U.S. made Harpoon missile at the ships. With Simpson having the only clear shot, the frigate fired an SM-1 standard missile which struck Joshan. Simpson fired three more SM-1s, and with later naval fire from Wainwright, sank the Iranian vessel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Hazard_Perry-class_frigate

On 18 April, Simpson, along with Wainwright and Bagley, destroyed Iranian naval and intelligence facilities on the oil platform Sirri in the Persian Gulf. Later that day, the ships encountered the Iranian Kaman-class (Combatte II type) missile patrol boat Joshan, which launched a Harpoon missile. Simpson immediately returned missile fire, striking Joshan in her superstructure. Joshan was then sunk by combined gunfire.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Simpson_(FFG-56)


 

點評

kds129  好的~我記錯,稍等修改,感謝指教  發表於 2016-6-24 09:01:47
生存之道 , 於知敵人 . 克敵之道 . 禮尚往來 . 以牙還牙
請注意︰利用多帳號發表自問自答的業配文置入性行銷廣告者,將直接禁訪或刪除帳號及全部文章!
您需要登錄後才可以回覆 登入 | 註冊


本論壇為非營利自由討論平台,所有個人言論不代表本站立場。文章內容如有涉及侵權,請通知管理人員,將立即刪除相關文章資料。侵權申訴或移除要求:abuse@oursogo.com

GMT+8, 2025-2-25 21:01

© 2004-2025 SOGO論壇 OURSOGO.COM
回頂部